英语演讲比赛注意的问题 Should delegates seek own agenda?
ZHANG Yin, the richest woman in the 2006 Hurun China Rich List and a delegate to the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC), has created a national controversy with her proposals at the CPPCC's annual session.
Zhang, chairwoman of paper manufacturer Nine Dragons Paper Ltd, made three proposals. First, she called for canceling indefinite-term employment contracts for labor-intensive companies. Second, she proposed reducing taxes for those earning more than 100,000 yuan a month. She also recommended that the State give tax breaks to companies imp
Her proposals have been criticized by other CPPCC members and many netizens. They say Zhang is on
However, other commentators point out that the CPPCC is meant to be a forum that gives members representing different social groups a chance to voice their opinions.
So, what do you think? Is it acceptable for a CPPCC member to make proposals that aim to promote the interests of their own social groups?
Zhang's proposals fall perfectly within her responsibilities as a CPPCC delegate.
1. Zhang's proposals would not on
2. CPPCC members are supposed to come from all walks of life and represent a wide social spectrum. That includes big companies and rich people. They make big contributions to the country in the form of taxes, and there is nothing wrong with them speaking their minds at a national forum.
3. These are on
CPPCC delegates should represent the whole nation.
1. The last change to the Labor Contract Law was passed by the National People's Congress, and the clauses about indefinite-term contracts were welcomed by millions of ordinary workers nationwide. It is inappropriate for Zhang to challenge this national consensus based on the interests of a small group.
2. Because of their special social status, CPPCC members' opinions, when made public, can influence policy-making. This requires them to be especially responsible and careful in what they say and do.
3. Delegates often make proposals based on the interests of their own social groups. But the fact that Zhang made three proposals, all seeking to advance her own interests, shows that she is rather narrow-minded in her conception of her political role. Neither is she being considerate of other social groups.CREATIVITY is what makes a piece of advertising unforgettable. But recently a TV ad has generated a buzz precisely because it lacks that essential ingredient.
The initial reaction to the ad was astonishment. But after repeated viewings of the ad, surprise began to give way to annoyance. Many viewers expressed their irritation on the Internet and wondered if the advertisers had lost their minds, resorting to such extreme measures to attract attention.
Some suggest the TV stations should be stricter with the content to prevent such irritating ads from being aired. However, others point out that the manufacturer achieved its goal. Whether the audience liked it or not, the ad certainly succeeded in making an impression. In this sense, it is very effective.
So what do you think? Should advertising resort to such bland methods to attract attention?
In the information age, catching consumers' attention is essential to success.
1. It's better to be hated than forgotten. There're too many ads with mediocre lines and ideas that fail to leave any impression. The Heng Yuan Xiang ad is just so bad that it has successfully become a focus of attention. Now everyone talks anout it. And it helps make the brand better known.
2. There's nothing wrong with the ad. The language is not offensive; there's no explicit or suggestive content. Advertising is not an art. It doesn't need to have any aesthetic values. If someone doesn't like an ad, they can switch channels. No on
The manufacturer is drawing attention to itself at the expense of its brand image.
1. The ad says nothing about the product itself. Many people's reaction to the ad is disgust. The image of the manufacturer is being greatly undermined by the ad. Few customers would want to associate themselves with the business that came up with such an annoying and unimaginative ad.
2. Quality always speaks loudest for a business. Though the ad had caused much controversy and the brand has become a household name almost overnight, it's doubtful whether the ad will attract more customers. In fact, many netizens have said they would never buy stuff from this company.
household name: 家喻户晓的人或事
The writer is a household name in his country. But it's the first time his book has been translated into Chinese.那个作家在自己国家是一个家喻户晓的人物，但这是他的作品第一次被翻译成中文。